Toni Morrison’s novel Jazz tells its story from an interesting
perspective in how distant the narrator is from the events that take place in
the story. This person never explicitly describes themself beyond a few lines
where they describe life within the City, and the information briefly presented
to the reader does not reveal much about their identity or the exact nature of
their relationship to anyone from the main cast. Their lack of influence on the
story sets them in the role of an observer rather than actor, but this does not
mean they are any less relevant in fulfilling the story’s purpose. Rather, it
reinforces the idea that the story could take place in any ordinary city in the
real world. The decision of writing the narrator as someone who is indirectly
involved in Jazz’s conflict gives
them the position of an outsider, just as the reader is in this situation, and
because of this, it is easier to read the narrator’s observations as those of a
person existing in reality, watching events as they unfold and interpreting them
as best they can.
The narrator’s existence as an individual in the setting
is important to note, as it is partly responsible for why the novel has such an
air of realism. In the earliest section, the unnamed narrator begins telling
the story from a first-person limited point of view, signified by the fact that
the first line is “I know that woman” (Morrison, 3), determining that even in a
community so large, the people within it live their lives close enough to each
other to at least know the names of their neighbors. An advantage of this
perspective is that the reader receives insight as to how the storyteller views
the world because their words act as a portal into their psyche, allowing for
them to reveal what they think about certain characters and specific
situations. Examples of this include the section in which they describe Violet’s
obsession with Dorcas after her funeral, as the narrator states that Violet “decided
to love-well, find out about-[Dorcas]” (Morrison, 5), and her internal conflict
in deciding whether or not the City is the haven she believes it to be is made
clear in the quote “Here comes the new…There goes the sad stuff” (Morrison, 7).
The former line shows the narrator is not always able to speculate exactly why
some characters make their decisions, and the latter line enlightens the reader
that the narrator can tolerate her environment more easily because of what good
it has to offer. Though they are not directly utilized in the main plot,
Morrison makes the narrator an effective element of the story by writing them
as an identifiable person.
While a first-person limited narrator has more
restrictive limitations compared to third-person in terms of how much
information they can divulge to the reader, there are opportunities granted by
these circumstances to make the story interesting. Jazz’s narrator in particular has the strength of being able to
interpret information about other people based on certain details about them,
as stated when they explain that they “[make] sure that no one knows…about
[them]” (Morrison, 8) and “watch…everyone” (Morrison, 8) so that nobody can
overpower them. In the world of the story, this narrator proves themself to be
a tactician in the midst of the numerous characters living in the City, someone
who detaches themself from society for their own well-being. The narrator’s signaling
to the reader that they keep their distance not only presents them as a unique
character but also justifies the decision for making them limited in their
knowledge of the scandal involving Violet, Joe Trace and the others.
Furthermore, the narrator’s characterization as someone
who lives in a state of solitude from their fellow citizens justifies the tone
which she tells the story through. They view the situation laid out before them
as a tragedy, but not something which she found to have been at all unexpected.
When describing the dual-edged nature of the City, the narrator mentions
without any sign of distress that they have been “exposed to all sorts of
ignorance and criminality” (Morrison, 8) and yet it is able to go about their
daily life in a state of indifference. They do not describe the events
involving Joe Trace and Dorcas with any outbursts of rage, simply disclosing
the facts as she was made aware of them. She has no relation to either of them,
and therefore has as much reason to involve themself in this scandal as in
anything else. It is arguable that they feel pity for Violet, as they describe
the rift that grows between them as “a poisoned silence [that] floated through
the rooms” (Morrison, 5). Still, though, the narrator’s decision to not break
from her philosophy of never entering other people’s social circles ultimately
proves her to be uncaring of Violet’s plight enough to stay away from any sign
of conflict.
The concept of a narrator in the setting of a community
being an individual who represents a bigger mass of individuals has not gone
unseen in other stories, but it is used well in Jazz for showing how distant the community becomes in response to a
tragedy. The narrator’s preference to maintain their distance from the main
cast makes them a representative for the other citizens, wanting nothing to do
with the conflict that suddenly arises. In this way, the narrator portrays a
morose vision of society in which people will be made fully aware of another
person’s misfortunes, but will not do anything to bring them solace because the
risk of bringing harm upon themselves is too great.
I like how you relate the narrator to the characters themselves but also to the audience. As i read the book, I tried to figure out how the narrator fit into the book and after reading you analysis it become a little clear on their role. A part that I really like about your essay is when you say when the "narrator in particular has the strength of being able to interpret information about other people based on certain details about them" and you bring in really good examples to back up your point.
ReplyDelete