Eliot’s “The Love Song of J. Alfred
Prufock” epitomizes ennui through the rite of passage of youth; a party. Parties
embody the recklessness, novelty and hormonally driven aspects of growing up
and are a trope throughout most teenage/young adults’ books, movies, etc.
Prufock’s overt denial of this rite of passage ties into his fear of social and
romantic rejection. While reading this piece, Prufock reminded me of a current
TV show: Riverdale. The quintessential teenage show, Riverdale, tails the
stories of jocks and cheerleaders, but also the angsty outcast Jughead as well.
Jughead has a party scene that expresses his disinterest or anxiety around the
social aspects of partying. Jughead’s character mirrors that of Prufock while
splitting in ideologies about love, expressing two conflicting views on where
love or wanted social interactions lay in a narrative full of ennui.
Prufock,
although anxious about most interactions in the party, has a special focus on
the fear of women. The poem portrays women in various lights, but heavily
emphasizes the line, “in the room the women come and go talking of Michelangelo”,
through repetition. This repetition makes the poem more oriented around Prufock’s
social interactions with women and points his fretting over appearance as a
fear of romantic rejection, rather than social. The line itself also expresses
how Prufock sees the women at the party, which extends his extreme angst.
Prufock sees a falsehood around these women who find themselves impressive
because they talk of high class, educated things of beauty, which they
themselves also seem to identify with. This show of impressiveness, does not
impress Prufock, as he continues to demean women and the idea of love later on
in the poem. But Jughead’s angst, although set in a similar situation, is
directed to a different group.
(Before I start on Jughead, please watch this clip (if you’d
like))
Although
this scene is an AWFUL piece of acting, Jughead’s overall angst is given
through the idea that he doesn’t belong in a normal social setting, much like
Prufock. But Jughead’s angst doesn’t quite fall into line with his counterpart.
In this episode, the jocks and cheerleaders of Riverdale take over Jughead’s
party, which upsets him infinitely. But there are specific aspects of his anger
that don’t make him completely anti-social or inept in the world. Jughead did
want to spend his birthday with others, but only a specified few, including his
girlfriend Betty. In this way, Jughead’s angst is not extended to Betty or his
affection for her/his other close friends. It seems, in fact, that Betty is a
driving force in his character development through her own genuine affection
towards him. Because of this, the two angsty characters don’t correlate.
Prufock’s
last couple stanzas (the utterly confusing ones) explain his disbelief in love
or genuine affection, which is the opposite of Jughead in this comparison of
ennui. In the stanza
“We have lingered in
the chambers of the sea
By sea-girls wreathed
with seaweed red and brown
Till human voices
wake us, and we drown”
Prufock sets up romantic intimacy as a trap, damning femininity
and love as nothing more than an alluring display to destroy men. His angst
pushes against the expectation that all will love and love as an innately good
thing. I think this is Eliot’s sarcastic critique on the heteronormative trope
throughout youngest adult literature about love and falling in love at first
sight with girls that aren’t even being genuine. Eliot argues that a life
without love is okay, because it further means that it is a life without
expectation, without judgement, and a way in which one can escape the necessity
to be held down by empty promises.
Jughead’s character
also critiques the genuine aspects of others, but doesn’t see love as his main
target, rather the social hierarchy that engulfs youth. Jughead embraces the
difficulty that comes with being in love (as he fights with Betty this whole
scene), but is incapable of interacting with people who only can look down on
him with judgement. Jughead’s perspective is that love is a genuine thing and
should be trusted and wanted, for the world itself is scary and trap like.
The two
antisocial characters cannot be denied the title of angsty youngsters, but both
have very different messages through their angst. Prufock is utterly against
the beauty of love, believing it is nothing more than a trickster mirage.
Jughead, on the other hand, relies heavily on love, or loved ones, to protect him
from outsiders that he casts his angst upon. Both boys use angst as a
protective measure, as not to get hurt, pushing away those that they feel self-conscious
around. It’s hard to be young!
I like the your comparison between Jughead and Prufrock. Personally watching Riverdale, I would not have made the connection between the two characters, which made me go back and think how both are very similar in many ways. I also like how to you kept tying your outside evidence back to the piece of the text you are writing about. Besides that it was over all really good.
ReplyDeleteI thoroughly enjoyed your piece on this and loved reading the contrast between Jughead and Prufrock. You tied your ideas in well and I'm very pleased with the way it is written and worded. I'm a Riverdale fan so it's quite interesting to see such an aged poem being tied in with a relatively new show. The only thing I would focus on is more analyzing the poem, there was a lot of Jughead discussion but maybe pushing more of Prufrock into the Jughead parts. I really liked it though!
ReplyDelete