"Depicting of Realities in the 1920s"
“Sth, I know that woman,” says the
narrator in the novel Jazz by Toni
Morrison (1). From this opening line, the novel begins to set up a vague
atmosphere with the information that the narrator knows “that woman,” whoever
she is. The narrator continues on to talk about the life and people in the “City,”
which is in New York during the years from 1919 to 1926. And as the plot revolves
around the various events that are associated with certain residents, the
narrator never reveals who s/he is to the readers. However, based on the way
the narrator talks and conveys his/her attitudes toward the functionality of
the city and its people, one may carefully make some assumptions about the
narrator.
Even though never mentioned, the
narrator seems to be a woman who lives in the city.
The
narrator includes explicit details while she unravels the events associated
with Violet, Dorcas, Joe Trace, and Alice. As the narrator shares stories about
different residents, the narrator slips that she hang around the beauty salons,
overhears the gossip of other women in town, and participated in a local
women’s organization when they were deciding on a case regarding Violet. Considering
these small hints, one may speculate that the narrator is a woman as she dwelled
in places—beauty salons and women’s organization—that men in 1920s would not
have usually hung around. Another evidence that support the assumption that the
narrator is a local resident of the city is based on her description of Violet.
When she first introduces Violet—Joe Trace’s wife who slashed a face of a dead
girl Dorcas at her funeral—she describes her as “awfully skinny, … fifty …
[who] is mean enough and good looking enough to think that even without hips or
youth she could punish Joe by getting herself a boyfriend (Morrison 4). As one
may notice, the narrator describes Violet’s body size and age, which hints that
the narrator has at least seen Violet or had some kind of association with her,
whether that may have been directly or indirectly. And the narrator talks about
Violet’s character as if she knows her well. As a matter of fact, the narrator
shares that people in town knew Violet well, just “like [her]” (Morrison 4). In
addition to the narrator’s claim of knowing Violet well, she tells the story in
third person’s point of view which helps in defining her attitudes toward the
city and its people.
As certain stories and events of the
city’s people gets told, the narrator slips out details about herself that help
readers to make assumptions about her attitudes. For instance, speaker claims
that she does not want people to know about her and that she “watches
everything and everyone and try to figure out their plans, reasonings”
(Morrison 8). From this claim, the narrator does not seem so positive about
being recognized as one of the residents of the city. However, she still wants
to be aware of other people’s business and comment on them. Moreover, she
provides a reason that make her want to be unnoticed; she states that the city
makes her be “exposed to all sorts of ignorance and criminality” (Morrison 8).
In this claim, the narrator evidently does not view the city or its people in a
good way; she considers that people in the city lack awareness and morals. And
because the people lack a sense of judgement in what is right or wrong,
criminal activities are prevalent in the city, which narrator does not seem to
accept unlike the rest of the city. Combining the narrator’s contrasting
desires (not wanting to be a part of the city but knowing city people’s
businesses) and her claim about the ignorance in people that further leads to
criminality, the narrator perceives the city and its people to be corrupted and
feels bitter in sharing stories about the city’s people.
One of the stories that the narrator
portrays her bitterness in is about Joe, Violet, and Dorcas. To briefly
summarize, Joe Trace and Violet are a married couple, and their relationship is
not a positive one as Joe portrays no affection toward Violet and she uses
other men to punish him in return. In simple, there seems to be no honesty,
respect, and love in their marriage. Joe Trace falls in love with an
18-year-old girl named Dorcas, who was raised as a niece to a woman named
Alice. Joe Trace’s love for Dorcas suddenly takes a weird turn in that he
shoots her which made Alice to host a funeral for her. At the funeral, Violet
causes a scene by slashing dead Dorcas’s face with a knife. As the narrator
tells this tragic story, she adds that “there was never anyone to prosecute him
because nobody actually saw him do it, and the dead girl’s aunt didn’t want to
throw money to helpless lawyers and laughing cops” (Morrison 4). As a reader, I
felt resentful when I read about this tragic event. And just like how the event
provoked feelings in me as a reader, the narrator—who actually lives in that
world—seems to convey her own feeling of bitterness in how Joe Trace got away
with a murder and how oblivious the aunt’s (Alice) decision is. The narrator’s
attitudes, at least in the first section of the novel, is composed of bitterness
and negativity toward the story’s events.
And the narrator’s attitude toward
the events that happened in the city and how people react to them influences us
as readers to view this novel in certain ways, depending on how individuals perceives
the story. As for myself, the narrator’s attitudes guided me to see how she was
depicting realities of New York in the 1920s. The decade, as we commonly refer
to as the “Roaring 20s,” was the time when not only economic prosperity was
present, but also when racial discrimination was severe. And among the many
inequalities caused by racial discrimination, justice for colored people were often
underserved or neglected. And the inequality and ineffectiveness of enforcing
laws to protect victims regardless of color may have led colored population in
the New York to be oblivious to crimes when present. By oblivious, I’m not saying
that people did not care but that they were oblivious to acknowledge the flaw
in their mindsets and their societies and make efforts to change or improve
them.
Hi Hyein!
ReplyDeleteYou do a great job of unraveling the mystery of who the narrator might be by connecting the various events of the novel into one whole timeline. I like that you mention how the narrator tries to connect the dots because it seems that your blog post is attempting the same thing. Your final paragraph puts Joe Trace's crime into a broader, historical context. This is important because history (especially African American history) is vital to Morrison's novel. I would suggest ending the blog post with a guess as to who the narrator might be. Since you spend the entire post gathering evidence, it only seems natural for you to provide a theory as to the narrator's identity.
Deanna
You provide some good insight into the narrator's lifestyle and motivations, but I wish you had incorporated evidence from later in the novel. Also, there are paragraphs throughout the book where the narrator describes the city in glowing terms, admiring it for its freedom and opportunities. I like how you covered the ways that the narrator dislikes the city, which are not immediately apparent in the text, but I feel like you could have tried to reconcile this cynicism with her more up-front idealism.
ReplyDelete