Connection in social
interaction is a key portion of the experience that shapes life on this planet.
Connection to a group is how animals
thrive and grow, including humans. Because these topics are so central to the development
of youth, they are common discussion in all types of media regardless of time. While
one may think that the way people interact has changed across generations, the
literary work “The Love Song of J Alfred Prufrock” by TS Eliot and the comedy
show Make Happy by Bo Burnham illustrate
that genuine interactions remain sought after by young people in any era.
“The Love Song of J
Alfred Prufrock” discusses how socializing lacks the genuine conversation and
connection that the narrator seeks. This first-person poem gives readers a look
at a 1920’s party through the eyes of young man racked with social anxiety and self-deprecating
inner dialogue. The first thought shown illustrates the narrator’s discomfort,
“time yet for a hundred indecisions, And for a hundred visions and revisions,
Before the taking of toast and tea.” If the reader pays close attention to line
breaks, this becomes an important passage. Indecision and revisions are the
places that Eliot chose to break the lines. These lines are also repeated in
moments of self-doubt for the narrator. An emphasis on the narrator’s desire to
change who he is to be accepted by the people around him. Revealing this innate
desire is followed by a verse that is also repeated, “the women come and go
Talking of Michelangelo.” Women in the
poem preen for attention by bringing up sophisticated topics, something of note
to the narrator, as an example of acceptable conversation. This moment, and the
“do I dare?” moments that accompany it are again repeated throughout the work.
This shows that the narrator is troubled by thoughts of superficial
conversations, and fears being judged for attempting genuine dialogue. Repetition
then represents this young character’s tumultuous mind of while fighting their
anxieties.
Honesty on connection is
a topic that Bo Burnham applies to consumerism in the music industry. The 2016 Netflix
special, Make Happy, attacks how
general songs have gotten through writing a song himself. “Repeat Stuff”, the
song, is a popular portion of the special that says, “But more than all of that
I love the fact that you are dumb enough, (Swag),To not realize everything I’ve
said has been said before, In a thousand ways, in a thousand songs, sung in the
same four chords” The more applicable a song is, the more sales the song has. The
artist is sacrificing their originality in exchange for popularity and money,
rather than put out unique music that could be judged more readily, just as Prufrock
fears. The use of the word “swag” in the middle of the verse is also used to
represent the monotony of popular songs. There are certain key words that
artists can put in their song to attract an audience, an teen nervous for
acceptance through the mainstream media perhaps. This is like the generic
topics of conversation Eliot discusses. This idea of “cookie cutter music” is reinforced with an acknowledgement of the
perversion of the chorus in modern music, “America says we love a chorus, But
don’t get complicated and bore us, Though meaning might be missin', We need to
know the words after just one listen so, Repeat stuff, repeat stuff, repeat
stuff” the chorus, as he mentions, is intended to impart the meaning of the
song and to enforce an idea the artist was working with. This is not the case
with modern music, which relies heavily on a catchy tune with a memorable beat
rather than content. This is similar to how Eliot points out conversation at
the parties Prufrock attends rely heavily on topics deemed to impress. That young
people are not comfortable enough express themselves, that they have to be as “cookie
cutter” as the music targeted at them in order to relate to others is something both authors discuss. In addition to referencing pop music today,
Burnham references “The Love Song of Alfred J Prufrock” in a satirical fashion,
“Love songs used to be so beautiful.."Let us go then, you and I, When the
evening is spread out against the sky, Like a patient etherized upon a
table." -T.S. Eliot. Nowadays, thanks to corporately-owned pop stars, love
songs are even more beautiful.” The reference to Eliot serves as a concrete
connection between the two pieces and is an example of the sarcastic tone
present in both. The line referenced is not “romantic”. The same biting tone
can be found in Prufrock’s references to himself, when he is wondering which
way he should part his hair, or comments about his weight. Both recognize that
youth are being conditioned to judge other people and the content they consume
on the surface. Burnham and Eliot use the sarcasm that they have to cover a point
they seem desperate to get across.
Both authors are
commenting on the quality of interaction in their time. Whether it be in the
social scene or through music, both make it clear that young people (in their
ennui) are searching for acceptance. They are in search of authenticity and
meaning in the life, despite the difference in time. Their message seems to be
that youth of all eras should embrace their uniqueness rather than try to fit
into a mold. Judging by their tones, young humans may continue to suffer
through the superficial for many generations to come.
I really enjoyed reading your essay! Although I have never seen the show "Make Happy," I can definitely understand your connection between the cookie cutter nature of modern music with the superficial nature of the conversations presented in Prufrock. The messages presented in both Prufrock and Make Happy are certainly very relevant in present-day society where individuals, particularly youth, are pressured into fitting a mold in order to be accepted by society. The only thing I would add is perhaps a little bit more explanation of the connection between the narrator's self-doubt and desire for social acceptance (in Prufrock). But other than that, the way you structure your essay by tying in lines from Prufrock and song lyrics from "Make Happy" was awesome!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteOkay, let me start off by saying that I loved this. The amount of detail and evidence that you give to support your argument is really strong and concrete. The fact that you were able to connect it to a show, that I personally have never seen or even heard of for that matter, really shows how you really understood what TS Eliot was conveying in his poem. I also really liked how you were able to tie in the satire found in both the poem and the show. What I would really like to know is, what other connections do you think exist between the show and the poem, I know that there has to be more than what you gave us. Regardless like I first mentioned I really enjoyed reading this, keep up the great work!
ReplyDelete