William Wordsworth defines poetry as “the spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings,” which aligns with the idea behind T. S. Eliot’s “The Lovesong of J. Alfred Prufrock” as an expression of youthful angst. Today, youths full of angst still use poetry as a way to express their feelings, but in a different light. A popular outlet for this angst is through YouTube and the performance of slam poetry. This can be demonstrated in Sabrina Benaim’s poem, “First Date” that she performs on the Button Poetry channel. There are many parallels between “First Date” and “The Lovesong of J. Alfred Prufrock” as they both express these youthful feelings of angst and use the form of poetry but they differ in means of expressing those feelings according to the time period in which they were created.
Both Eliot and Benaim’s poems highlight youthful feelings of angst, but their feelings are fitting to the time period in which they are written. In “The Lovesong of J. Alfred Prufrock,” the speaker of the poem appears to be “etherized” by the women in the room of a party. His own self-consciousness gets in the way of his ability to speak to the women he is intimidated by and and compares it to disturbing the universe (45). He is concerned with the way he is dressed, his bald spot, and his body composition thus inhibiting him from engaging with the women in the room. “First Date” shows similar self-consciousness, but more in the way that she carries herself. She writes, “I wouldn’t say I am sensitive. I would say I am highly susceptible to feeling a lot,” exposing her insecurities about her feelings (12). She compares them to Forrest Gump’s box of chocolates analogy, but instead of not knowing what you get, she says she would rather eat them. This mentality of “eating one’s feelings” is a common expression when people are experiencing feelings of angst or anxiety. These hyperbolic statements are expressions of youthful angst and are reflections of the period in which they are written.
In addition, both Eliot and Benaim use the form of poetry to describe their feelings of angst. Eliot uses imagery and repetition to emphasize his main points throughout his poem. The refrain of his poem is “In the room the women come and go/ Talking of Michelangelo” which is meant to highlight what it is that is giving him feelings of angst (13-14). The women in the room intimidate him and the women are again brought up in the last lines of the poem in the form of sea-girls. Using the form of sea-girls, Eliot demonstrates a sense of disillusionment with the imagery that these women will drown him once reality sets back in. Yet, he also couples this with the idea of romance not being a reality, but rather a myth beside the sea-girls. Benaim, on the other hand, uses spoken word poetry and rather than using meter and rhyme, her method of delivery is in the delivery itself. The way she delivers a line and the rate at which the words flow from her mouth are what give emphasis to her main points. She speeds up just before a key line and slows down to get her audience to think about what it is she is saying. She uses onomatopoeia and repetition to bring attention to a specific line and use of short, sensory words create a child-like image in the audience’s mind. For example, when Benaim fluctuates the rate in her words for the lines, “Snap, Crackle, or Pop, me? Pop! I mean I got this violent tendency to see a bubble and want to pop it, which is to say I have held love. But I popped it and locked it, then dropped it and lost it. I don’t mind,” she is showing her angst in knowing that she once had something of value, yet does not mind that she has lost it (17-18). For, it is common in today’s time to nonchalantly act as though love does not hurt. Instead, we must show strength and patience as she also says the she “learn[s] love like ‘wait for it’” (21). The use of poetry both in early twentieth century and current twenty first century is a common expression of youthful angst, but the styles of poetry differ.
These two poems differ in delivery and demonstration in the display of youthful angst. “The Lovesong of J. Alfred Prufrock” is organized, it has stanzas, formal rhyme pattern, and is meant to be read on paper. Whereas “First Date” shows none of these attributes and is focused on delivery and references to pop culture to demonstrate its points. Both of these works represent youthful angst surrounding romance and are effective in their goals to deliver such feelings. They do so in ways that are representative of the time periods in which they were written and appeal to the audiences of such times.
Hi Sarah! You make some great connections between the two poems, especially in your analysis of the "powerful feelings" which both poems convey. I like that you deconstructed how each poem delivered these angsty feelings through hyperbole, imagery, et cetera. These are important vehicles in poetry, but especially in ones that attempt to illustrate angst. My only suggestion is that you make it clear whether the poems are more different or similar. Towards the end, I wasn't sure if you were focusing on their contrasts or similarities.
ReplyDeleteInteresting analysis! I really like how you demonstrate the parallels of youthful angst between the two time periods of Eliot and Benaim. I find it interesting how as time has evolved, so has the number of different outlets to display feelings of angst, such as Benaim's slam poem. You did a really good job of organizing your paragraphs, with the time periods and the use of imagery. These all demonstrate the numerous forms that poetry can come in. If I could improve upon one thing, it would be to utilize more examples from Eliot's poem to really solidify the similarities and differences between the two poems. Overall, well done!
ReplyDeleteReally good work here. I was really amazed by the comparison you decide to write on. The way you connected the angst in both poems really work out. In other words, I can see your point of view clearly. At the same time however, I was a little confused whether you were contrasting or finding similarities. Overall, its great work.
ReplyDeleteHi Sarah,
ReplyDeleteFirst things first, I really like your writing style. They are very organized, structured, and cohesive! Aside from the writing style, I really liked how you briefly explained T. S. Eliot’s “The Lovesong of J. Alfred Prufrock” but also did not forget to analyze some of the important elements in it. The comparison you made between Eliot's and Sabrina Benaim’s poem “First Date” is very clear and organized, making it easier for readers to comprehend it. One thing I would add is more examples to make a clear line between compare and contrast.
Sarah, this poetry comparison was really thoughtful. The quotes explaining each poem were clear without bogging down the analysis. The comparisons you drew also helped me understand what each poem was going for, even though I've never seen "First Date." I think this could be improved by varying the sentence structure. So many long sentences in a row made it hard to process all the information being thrown at me. Still, this is a good analysis.
ReplyDelete